| 1. |
SENATE MEMBERSHIP |
| |
| |
Senate noted
that Executive Council is in the process of appointing two members of
Senate. They will fill the existing vacancy for a person nominated by
the Leader of the Opposition (previously Mr Buxton) and the impending
vacancy of a person nominated by the Premier (currently Dr Cawley). |
| |
| |
1.1 |
Chair of Equity and Equal Opportunity
Committee |
| |
| |
Dr Cawley’s
departure will create a vacancy in the Chair of Equity and Equal Opportunity
Committee. On the recommendation of the Acting Chancellor, Senate |
| |
| |
Resolved: S/38/2004 |
to appoint
Ms Margaret Banks as Chair of the Equity and Equal Opportunity Committee
for a term expiring on 31 December 2005. |
| |
| 2. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST |
| |
| |
There were no declarations of
interest. |
| |
| 3. |
REGIONAL ENGAGEMENT |
| |
| |
The meeting
noted the annual report on
the Regional Engagement Operational Plan. The Pro Vice Chancellor (Regional
Development), Professor Kateryna Longley, gave a powerpoint presentation.
She drew attention to the SW region having a strategic role in the University’s
future; the Rockingham and Peel campuses are in areas experiencing some
of the fastest population growth nationally; the campuses have strong
regional support; and the University aims to lift higher education participation
rates and to be the preferred supplier of research in the SW. She identified
several issues for the University: effective marketing to fill the new
DEST places, aligning courses with jobs, achieving balance between course
range and viability, building a sense of local identity on each campus,
developing collaborative governance arrangements with partners at Peel,
developing regionally relevant research, master planning for expansion
of the Rockingham campus to the west, and building local support and trust
to become the university of the region.
Several matters were raised
in discussion:
- school visits as part of the recruitment
strategies – these had been reduced over the previous twelve
months but were now reinstated to previous levels;
- staffing at the regional campuses,
including steps to have staff based at that campus and to establish
a research culture even while staff numbers are small;
- analysing the skills needed in the
Kwinana industrial area – the University is a member of various
partnerships in Kwinana and will use those contacts to conduct such
a study;
- the regional campuses can be attractive
to country parents;
- reducing the drift of students to the
main campus, which will be assisted by the offering of courses on
one campus only (e.g. Nursing, Engineering);
- the challenges of offering niche courses;
and
- the possible need for a manager based
at the regional campuses.
The Vice Chancellor advised
that places for the regional campuses are the strongest part of the University’s
bid for additional HECS-funded places. The meeting was informed that the
University’s research statistics data collection is being modified
to identify research relevant to the SW being undertaken, not only by
Rockingham Campus staff, but by staff at all Murdoch campuses. Professor
Longley suggested the selection criteria for some positions should include
a commitment to activities in the regional campuses. The popularity of
the nursing course has led to some student places being transferred from
the Murdoch to the Peel Campus. |
| |
| 4. |
HECS TOP-UP FEES |
| |
| |
Academic Council
had recommended that the University implement HECS top-up fees as permitted
under the Higher Education Support Act 2003. This recommendation is held
over till the 5 July meeting of Senate, to be considered along with the
additional information requested by Council and Council’s response
to that.
This meeting gave preliminary
consideration to the matter. The discussion was introduced by a powerpoint
presentation from the President
of Academic Council, Assoc Prof Michael Borowitzka. He outlined four main
issues: the need for extra funds; equity considerations; strategic implications;
and how the additional income might be distributed. He invited Senate
to identify any additional issues it wishes to see considered, and any
matters on which it wishes to receive further information. Individual
Senators identified the following matters:
- Modelling of equity implications by
School
- Projected income per year, in 2005-2008
- Other options for raising the funds
needed
- Who gets the income from the fee
- Whether students would benefit in the
initial few years, or if it would result in the status quo remaining
- The impact on those part-time students
who are not in full-time employment, and how they should be treated
in the fee proposal
- The potential to deter students from
going to university and from enrolling in the more expensive courses.
Any research results on how many students are discouraged from attending
university by fees and prospective fees.
- Whether to exempt from the top-up fee
those continuing students who transfer course [and the effect of this
on the income projections]
- HECS top-up fees for postgraduate students
- Market differentiation in WA by being
the one university without HECS top-up fees
- The undesirability of allocating all
the income to Schools without any allocation to overheads
- The benefits of the increased income
could be offset by the alleged defects of the Murdoch Funding Model
in distributing these funds, so needs to be considered in tandem with
recommendations on changes to that Model
- Any market research on whether having
lower fees than other WA universities would increase the demand for
student places
- Are there some courses the University
should not charge HECS top-up, in order to be more competitive
- Should top-up HECS be introduced in
2005, or gradually
- The supporting papers on this matter
need to be substantial, and should include the federal government’s
rationale for the de-regulation of university fees
- The extent to which the fees income
can be used to reduce the disparity between the costs of some courses
and their income
- The need for specific recommendations
to Senate on HECS top-up fees
The Guild President tabled
the following petition, signed by 2,766 students and staff: "We,
the undersigned students and staff of Murdoch University, implore the
Senate to not increase HECS fees above the current HECS levels. We believe
such an increase would greatly disadvantage current students and discourage
prospective students, especially those from a lower socio-economic background
from undertaking studies and Murdoch University." |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/39/2004 |
(a) |
that the
issues identified in this debate be summarised in an email and sent to
all Senators within 24 hours of this meeting, with a request that they
email the University Secretary by close of business on Tuesday 25 May
if there are any further issues any Senator wants to be considered; |
| |
|
|
(b) |
that this
feedback be forwarded to the Academic Council Consultative Committee on
the Murdoch Funding Model; |
| |
|
|
(c) |
that the
report of the Consultative Committee, and the minutes of the Academic
Council debate on that report at its meeting on 16 June, be circulated
to all Senators by 23 June. |
| |
| |
The Acting Chancellor flagged
that a special meeting of Senate might be needed to consider this and other
matters. |
| |
| 5. |
LAKEVIEW APARTMENTS |
| |
| |
This matter
was considered in camera. The meeting noted the contents of the briefing
paper on Lakeview, and discussed the implications of having to remedy
a defect that Lakeview had supposedly previously been remedied. The General
Counsel summarised the situation. It was agreed to reaffirm the amount
previously agreed as the settlement offer, with this offer to stand for
a relatively limited period of time (e.g. 30 days), with the General Counsel
to have discretion in setting this timeframe. |
| |
| 6. |
POSITION OF PRO CHANCELLOR |
| |
| |
The term
of the current Pro Chancellor (Judge Kate O’Brien) expires on 9
July 2004. The Chancellor had taken soundings among members of Senate. |
| |
| |
Resolved: S/40/2004 |
(a) |
to invite
Senators to submit nominations for the position of Pro Chancellor to the
Chancellor by close of business on Monday 24 May; |
| |
|
|
(b) |
that a postal
ballot then be conducted by the University Secretary, with the result
to be announced by the Chancellor at or before the 5 July meeting of Senate. |
| |
| 7. |
VICE CHANCELLOR'S REPORT |
| |
| |
The meeting
noted the Vice Chancellor’s written report.
In a brief oral report, he highlighted that the University has been certified
by the U.S. Government to manage U.S. financial aid for American students
at the University; Professor Peter Newman has been appointed part-time
Commissioner for Sustainability and Population Growth for Sydney; and
the Vice Chancellor has been appointed to the AVCC Working Party on Auditing
of University Quality.
There were two recommendations
in the Vice Chancellor’s report: |
| |
| |
7.1 |
Selection Committee –
Executive Dean, Division of Arts |
| |
| |
The Vice
Chancellor amended his recommendation by the addition of another member
of academic staff from the Division. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/41/2004 |
to approve the
following membership of the Selection Committee for the position of Executive
Dean of Arts:
- Professor John Yovich, Vice Chancellor
(Chair)
- Professor Andris Stelbovics, Pro Vice
Chancellor (Research)
- Professor Jan Thomas, Pro Vice Chancellor
(Academic)
- Emeritus Professor Geoffrey Bolton, representing
Senate
- Professor Trish Harris, School of Social
Sciences and Humanities
- Associate Professor Chris Kendall, Dean
of Law
- Associate Professor Gail Phillips, School
of Media Communication and Culture
- Mr Ed Herne, Director of Finance and Resources,
Division of Arts
- student nominee appointed by the Vice
Chancellor after considering nominations from the Guild of Students
|
| |
| |
7.2 |
Emeritus Professors |
| |
| |
The title
Emeritus Professor may be ‘conferred on a retiring Professor of
the University’. It was proposed to amend the policy for Honorary
Titles and Appointments to allow for the title to be awarded not only
to staff who are retiring from employment, but also to distinguished senior
academic staff who leave the University to take up an appointment as a
senior public officer. Senate broadened this to include professors who
leave to take up substantial positions that are outside the public sector. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/42/2004 |
to approve
the following amendment to the policy on Honorary Titles and Appointments
[additions in bold]:
Coverage
The title of Emeritus Professor may be conferred on a retiring Professor
of the University in recognition of sustained outstanding service to the
University.
In this policy, “retiring”
includes terminating his/her employment with the University for the purpose
of accepting an appointment to a position of substantial standing. |
| |
| |
Following
this policy change, the Vice Chancellor advised that he will now confer
the title of Emeritus Professor on Justice Ralph Simmonds, the former
Foundation Dean of Law. |
| |
| 8. |
2003 ANNUAL REPORT |
| |
| |
The meeting
considered the main text of the draft Annual Report of the University
for 2003. [The key performance indicators appear in the following agenda
item. The financial statements had been considered at the previous meeting.]
It was agreed to ask the General Counsel to review the timing of when
the full Annual Report must be provided to the Minister each year. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/43/2004 |
(a) |
to endorse
the draft Annual Report of the University for 2003; |
| |
|
|
(b) |
to invite
Senators with any editorial suggestions about the report to pass them
to the University Secretary. |
| |
| 9. |
KEY PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
FOR 2003 |
| |
| |
The Financial
Administration and Audit Act requires the University’s annual report
to contain performance indicators as directed by the Treasurer's Instructions.
These KPIs are determined by the Office of the Auditor General for use
by all four public universities in WA. They are not the same as those
used by the University in assessing performance against the Strategic
Plan. It was noted that the Auditor-General had already provided his audit
opinion on these KPIs. The Vice Chancellor invited any Senators with comments
about the KPIs to forward these to him. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/44/2004 |
to endorse
the Key Performance Indicators (attached to the Senate agenda) for inclusion
in the 2003 Annual Report. |
| |
| 10. |
CAMPUS MASTER PLAN –
VISION STATEMENT |
| |
| |
The Director
of Campus Development (Alan McGregor) gave a brief presentation on the
proposed vision statement for the Master
Plan. He emphasised the importance of having such a statement when undertaking
consultations with the local community. A comprehensive report will come
to Senate in August, with zoning and a comprehensive masterplan a year
later. The Vice Chancellor advised that Melville City Council requires
at least a zone plan before it will approve buildings on the campus.
Some Senators felt that there
was insufficient information before the meeting to endorse the proposed
vision statement and zoning. Several suggestions were made by individual
Senators: have connecting corridors for fauna between areas of retained
bushland (this related to specific detail of the plan and was noted for
future consideration); the vision statement should not limit the basis
of investment partnerships to financial returns; and the vision statement
in the previous masterplan was preferable and should be included in the
information provided to Senate. Mr McGregor outlined the consultative
process that had been followed. Some Senators felt that wider consultations,
including further consultation with Environmental Committee, should take
place before a vision statement comes to Senate for approval. The meeting
deferred a decision on the proposed vision statement, and decided to address
only the pressing zoning decisions. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/45/2004 |
to approve the following zoning
approach for the Murdoch Campus: |
| |
|
|
(a) |
residential use be limited to
the brown area shown on the attached map; |
| |
|
|
(b) |
mixed business use be restricted
to the blue area on the attached map. |
| |
| |
Mr Gillam declared an interest
and abstained from the vote. |
| |
| 11. |
STATUTE CHANGES |
| |
| |
11.1 |
Ratification of Statutes |
| |
| |
The last
meeting of Senate approved amendments to two Statutes. Notice of the proposed
Statute changes had been displayed within the University in accordance
with the provisions of section 25 of the Murdoch University Act. The University
Secretary had received no objection to the amendments. Senate therefore |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/46/2004 |
to ratify
the following changes to Statute No. 11 - Admissions and Statute No. 24
- Research & Development Board [deletions struck through, additions
in bold]: |
| |
| |
|
|
Statute No. 11 - Admissions |
| |
|
|
2. |
The Deputy
Pro Vice Chancellor (Academic) shall will
be responsible for determining the levels of admission quotas and targets
for the entire University, for levels of study and for parts of the University.
The Deputy Pro Vice Chancellor (Academic) shall
will exercise this power only after consultation with the Executive
Deans. |
| |
| |
|
|
Statute No. 24 -
Research & Development Board |
| |
|
|
8. |
A casual
vacancy of more than six months shall will be filled by
a new appointment or election for the balance of the term as follows:
- staff members: Academic Council will appoint a
replacement member.
- elected student member: the Secretariat of the Guild
of Students will appoint a replacement member
from among those students eligible for election to the position. |
| |
| |
The Acting
Chancellor declared that in accordance with s.25 of the Murdoch University
Act, the resolution had been carried by an absolute majority of members
of the Senate. |
| |
| |
11.2 |
Approval of Statutes |
| |
| |
Legislation
Committee has recommended amendments to two Statutes. The effect of these
amendments would be to transfer custody of the Official Seal from the
University Secretary to the General Counsel, thereby ensuring a sole point
of responsibility for the University’s contractual undertakings;
and to amend who may charge a student with misconduct, reflecting the
new executive structure. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/47/2004 |
to approve
the following amendments to Statute No. 1 - Official Seal and Statute
No. 4 - Degrees, Diplomas and Certificates: |
| |
| |
|
|
Statute No. 1 - Official Seal |
| |
|
|
s.1-3 |
delete “Secretary”
wherever it appears and insert “General Counsel” in its place |
| |
|
|
Statute No. 4 - Degrees, Diplomas
and Certificates |
| |
|
|
s.7(3) |
delete “Deputy Vice Chancellor”
and in its place insert “General Counsel” |
| |
| |
The Acting
Chancellor declared that in accordance with s.25 of the Murdoch University
Act, the resolution had been carried by an absolute majority of members
of the Senate. |
| |
| 12. |
RETIRING SENATOR |
| |
| |
This was
the last Senate meeting for Dr Sally Cawley, whose term on Senate expires
on 31 May. The Acting Chancellor thanked Dr Cawley for her contributions
as Chair of the Equity and Equal Opportunity Committee, which she had
revamped and revived, and as a member of the Vice Chancellor Search and
Selection Committee. In reply, Dr Cawley expressed her best wishes for
the University and her interest in having an ongoing role with the University
in a different capacity. |
| |
| 13. |
RESOURCES COMMITTEE |
| |
| |
Senate noted
the minutes of the meetings of Resources Committee held on 4 May 2004,
along with papers that went to it concerning controlled subsidiary
companies. There were three recommendations to Senate; one of these
had been considered at item 10 above, while another (concerning Beeliar
Regional Park) was held over till the July meeting of Senate, when further
information will be available. |
| |
| |
13.1 |
Capital Management Plan –
Possible Projects |
| |
| |
Resources Committee
had considered a discussion paper on the Capital Management Plan and its
funding requirements. The Committee was concerned about the unfunded nature
of possible projects currently on the drawing board, and to ensure that
proposals for major capital works are accompanied by a business case that
justifies the investment, using feasibility studies where appropriate.
The Committee requested that a 5 and 10 year view on capital funding requirements
be prepared.
In discussion at Senate,
attention was drawn to the need for buildings to cope with the projected
increase in student numbers in the next three years. [Note: The University
has submitted a bid for 750 additional Commonwealth-supported student
places. If the University were to get 500 of these places, student load
will rise by 17% over the next four years, even without any increase in
international and domestic full-fee places.] It was suggested that the
key issue is prioritising the proposed capital projects. The Chair of
Resources Committee suggested that Senators be sent the paper that had
gone to Resources Committee. [Note: This is enclosed for Senators.]
The Vice Chancellor advised
that while several possible capital projects have been identified, decisions
on the building needs must await the federal Government's allocation of
new student places, and that business plans are in the process of development.
He also reported that the Pro Vice Chancellor (Resource Management) is
structuring an investment plan for use of endowed funds.
The meeting supported the
suggestion made at Resources Committee that a working party review the
use of revenue from endowment funds generated by commercial activities. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/48/2004 |
to appoint
Mr Malcolm Macpherson as chair of a working party to review the use of
revenue from endowment funds generated by commercial activities. |
| |
| |
13.2 |
Approval of Payments |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/49/2004 |
to approve the
following payments:
- Australian Taxation Office – PAYG
tax ($749,471)
- Australian Taxation Office – PAYG
tax ($753,565)
- Australian Taxation Office – PAYG
tax ($738,109)
- State Revenue – Payroll tax ($587,191)
|
| |
| 14. |
MINUTES |
| |
| |
Senate confirmed
the minutes of the meeting held on
29 March 2004. It also noted action
taken to implement the resolutions of Senate. |
| |
| 15. |
ACADEMIC COUNCIL |
| |
| |
Senate noted
the minutes
of the meeting of Academic Council held on 14 April 2004. Several items
contained recommendations to Senate. One of these had already been considered
in item 4 above. |
| |
| |
15.1 |
2005 Academic Planning - Amendments
to Regulations |
| |
| |
Academic
Council had recommended amendments to the University’s internal
legislation to reflect new courses being introduced in 2005. Legislation
Committee had endorsed the form of the legislative changes proposed, subject
to one drafting change, which the President of Council has accepted. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/50/2004 |
to approve the following amendments
to Certificate Regulation 1, Diploma Regulation 1 and Master by Coursework
Degree Regulations 1-2: |
| |
| |
|
|
Certificate Regulations |
| |
|
|
1(c) |
insert “Health,
Safety and the Environment (GradCertHSE)” and “Security, Terrorism
and Counterterrorism Studies (GradCertSecurTerr)” |
| |
|
|
Diploma Regulations |
| |
|
|
1.(1)(b) |
insert “Health,
Safety and the Environment (GradDipHSE)” |
| |
|
|
1.(1)(c) |
insert “Internetworking
and Security (PgDipIntwkSecur)”, “Professional Experience
(fieldname) (PgDipProfExp[fieldname])” and “Psychology (PgDipPsych)” |
| |
|
|
1.(2) |
renumber
as (3), and insert new (2): “The President of Academic Council will
determine the field name in the title of the Postgraduate Diploma in Professional
Experience, acting in accordance with guidelines approved by Academic
Council. The University Secretary will determine the abbreviated title
for each such diploma.” |
| |
|
|
Master by Coursework Degree Regulations |
| |
|
|
1(1) |
insert: “MBA
in Health Services Management (Nursing Leadership) (MBAHSM)” |
| |
|
|
1(2) |
insert: “MBA
in Health Services Management - 48 points” |
| |
| |
15.2 |
Graduate Attributes |
| |
| |
In July 2000
Senate adopted a set of seven generic attributes for graduates. Academic
Council has recommended that Senate approve a revised list. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/51/2004 |
(a) |
to approve the following revised
list of Graduate Attributes:
1. Communication
2. Critical and Creative Thinking
3. Social Interaction.
4. Independent and Lifelong Learning
5. Ethics
6. Social Justice
7. Global Perspective
8. Interdisciplinarity
9. In-depth Knowledge of a Field of Study |
| |
|
|
(b) |
to rescind resolution S/42/2000
concerning graduate attributes. |
| |
| 16. |
LEGISLATION COMMITTEE |
| |
| |
Senate noted
the minutes of the
meeting of Legislation Committee held on 6 May 2004. The recommendation
about Statute changes had already been considered at item 11.2 above. |
| |
| |
16.1 |
Constitution of Legislation
Committee |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/52/2004 |
to amend the constitution of Legislation
Committee by adding the General Counsel as a member. |
| |
| |
16.2 |
Murdoch University Act |
| |
| |
Legislation
Committee had noted amendments to the Act that will be required to comply
with the National
Governance Protocols. The Governance Working Party will bring forward
recommendations on these to the July meeting of Senate. The Committee
had considered whether there are any further amendments that the University
might want made to the Act. On its recommendation, Senate |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/53/2004 |
to recommend
to the Minister for Education the following additional amendments to the
Murdoch University Act:
- to remove all gender-specific language
- to provide some flexibility in the terms
of the Chancellor and Pro Chancellor
- to amend s.20(2d) by deleting “not
being a member of the Guild” and in its place inserting “being
or not being a member of the Guild”.
|
| |
| |
16.3 |
University Seal |
| |
| |
Senate at
an earlier stage of the meeting had approved a Statute change transferring
authority for use of the Official Seal. There was a consequential resolution
needed to authorise the General Counsel to apply the Seal to particular
types of documents. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/54/2004 |
with effect
from the date of gazettal of the amendment to Statute No. 1 - Official
Seal recommended by this meeting: |
| |
|
|
(a) |
to rescind
resolution S/90/1985; |
| |
|
|
(b) |
to authorise
the General Counsel, for the purposes of clause 1 of Statute no. 1,
to use the official seal in relation to the following classes of documents:
|
| |
|
|
|
|
All documents
requiring to be executed under seal in the conduct of the ordinary and
usual business of the University, including documents dealing with land,
documents dealing with stocks and shares, formal contracts with Commonwealth
and State Governments or their departments, formal deeds such as guarantees,
bonds, assignments, licences, indemnities, releases and discharges, building
contracts, apprenticeship agreements, agreements relating to fellowships
or scholarships and other agreements of a like nature. |
| |
|
|
(c) |
the General
Counsel report to each meeting of the Senate in relation to the documents,
if any, to which the official seal has been affixed since the previous
Senate meeting. |
| |
| 17. |
ENVIRONMENTAL COMMITTEE |
| |
| |
Senate noted
the minutes of the meeting
of the Environmental Committee held on 31 March 2004. There were no recommendations
for Senate. |
| |
| 18. |
GOVERNANCE WORKING PARTY |
| |
| |
Senate noted
the minutes of the meetings of the Governance Working Party held on 8
and 27 April 2004.
The following items contained recommendations to Senate: |
| |
| |
18.1 |
Equity and Equal Opportunity
Committee |
| |
| |
In August
2002, Senate resolved that the future of the Equity and Equal Opportunity
Committee be reviewed at the end of 2003. The Governance Working Party
had conducted this review, and concluded that the revamped committee is
performing a useful role. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/55/2004 |
to retain the Equity and Equal
Opportunity Committee. |
| |
| |
18.2 |
Summer Committee |
| |
| |
The working
party believed that an executive committee is needed over the summer period
when there is three months between Senate meetings. It was agreed to suggest
Summer Committee as the title, as this clearly indicates the role of the
Committee and avoids any connotations of a kitchen cabinet. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/56/2004 |
to establish
a Summer Committee, as follows:
Terms of Reference
To exercise all of the powers of the Senate, except the power to make
Statutes, By-laws and regulations, during the period between the last
Senate meeting of the year and the first Senate meeting of the new year.
Constitution
Chancellor, Vice Chancellor and three other Senators appointed by Senate
at the November Senate meeting each year, with power to co-opt for particular
issues. A notice will be sent to all Senators prior to the November Senate
meeting, asking whether they would be available and willing to serve on
the committee. |
| |
| |
18.3 |
Role of Senate |
| |
| |
The Higher
Education Support Act 2003 includes a requirement that all universities
adhere to the National Governance Protocols if they are to receive increased
funding. When reviewing the extent to which the University already complies
with the Protocols, the Governance Working Party noted that the Senate
role statement does not explicitly include three points required by Protocol
2. The Working Party saw these changes as non-contentious. On its recommendation,
Senate |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/57/2004 |
to amend the
summary of Senate’s role stated in resolution S/66/2001(a), as follows
[deletion struck through, additions in bold]:
- appointment and performance management
of the Vice Chancellor
- setting strategic directions for the
University
- monitoring University performance against
strategic objectives, including, through the Vice Chancellor and
Academic Council, the academic activities of the University
- setting
and critically monitoring
policy and risk management policy and critically monitoring
the management of risk across the University, including commercial
undertakings
- setting policy on strategic matters
and on other matters reserved for Senate
- setting and monitoring broad budget
and planning frameworks, approving the annual budget and business
plan, ensuring that the University finances are sound and taking
major financial decisions
- oversight of management
- overview of any controlled entities
- legislative role, including ensuring
that the University is acting ethically and in conformity with all
legal requirements
|
| |
| |
18.4 |
Terms of Reference of Nominating
Committee |
| |
| |
The Working
Party had recommended that the terms of reference of Nominating Committee
should be extended to include the other criteria stipulated in the National
Governance Protocols. |
| |
| |
Resolved:
S/58/2004 |
to amend the terms of reference
of Nominating Committee by the addition of the following: |
| |
|
|
4. |
In making its
recommendations, the Committee shall also take into account the following
criteria:
- whether those considered have an appreciation
of the values of a university and its core activities of teaching
and research, its independence and academic freedom;
- whether they can contribute to Senate
by having (or having the capacity to develop) a good understanding
of what the external community needs from the University;
- the extent to which the experience of
the persons being considered will contribute to the effective working
of Senate.
|
| |
| 19. |
ENROLMENT TRENDS |
| |
| |
In October
2003, Senate resolved that it be kept fully informed on enrolment trends
of both local and overseas students, by means of twice-yearly reports
that include comparative data for the whole Western Australian university
sector. The Pro Vice Chancellor (Strategy) plans to report on first and
second semester enrolment trends to Senate’s May and November meetings
each year. Senate noted the first half-yearly report. |
| |
| 20. |
OFFICIAL
SEAL |
| |
| |
The meeting
noted that, in accordance with resolution 90/85, the Official Seal of
the University had been applied to the following documents since the last
meeting of Senate –
- Extension of Memorandum of Agreement
with the University of Wollongong re Australian Consortium for In-Country
Indonesian Studies
- Deed of Confidentiality of Thesis Examination,
with Prof Lyn Abbott, Emeritus Prof Peter Bergquist and Dr Peter Franzmann
- Educational Services Agreement with
CM Management (Sarawak) Sdn Bhd and State Government of Sarawak
|
| |
| 21. |
MATTERS
FOR NOTING |
| |
| |
The meeting
noted extracts from the Australian Universities Quality Agency’s
Report of an Audit of The University of Western Australia; a DEST summary
of the new Backing Australia’s Ability science and innovation package;
and a calendar of reports to
be made to Senate each year.
The meeting closed at 8.09pm. |
| |
|
|
|
|
|